Skip to the content
All 31 lessons
Positive emotion Reframing 40 minutes

What else is also true?

Learning intention By the end of this lesson, students can find a second honest frame for a difficult situation and explain how it changes the possible next steps.

This classroom lesson is the base for session 3 of Ten sessions for advocates.

Time
40 minutes
How the room works
Groups of three or four
You need
Paper, pens and fictional scenario cards

Before you start

Never ask students to reframe trauma, discrimination, abuse or a live personal difficulty. Keep scenarios fictional and personal reflection low-stakes.

Read the full safeguarding note Adapting it for your class A note home for this lesson
A person shaping a lump of clay with both hands
Illustration by RecipesforWellbeing.org, CC BY-NC 4.0

Open this drawing in the library

Scan for this lesson online

Why this matters

When something goes wrong, the first story about it can feel like the only truth. Reframing keeps the facts and the difficult feeling. It asks whether another part of the situation is also true, and whether that wider view makes another response possible.

Skill in context Finding another honest angle that makes a difficult situation feel less fixed without denying what hurts.

On the skill of reframingTry the interactive practice
1

Open with “Stress, reintroduced”

5 min

Use Stress, reintroduced as an optional experiment in interpretation. The bodily feeling may remain uncomfortable, and students do not need to believe a new story.

Read aloud

Notice whether pressure is present in your body today, perhaps as a faster heartbeat, a busy stomach or no clear sensation at all.

One possible way to read these sensations is that the body is preparing to meet a demand. That interpretation may be useful, and it may not fit every situation.

If you would like to, take an ordinary breath and try the sentence, "My body is responding, and I can decide what support I need."

The sensation does not need to disappear, and you can return your attention to the room whenever you choose.

Listen for Scepticism and discomfort are valid. Do not claim that a reframe improves performance or makes stress helpful in every context.

2

Teacher explanation

10 min

A frame directs attention towards some parts of a situation and away from others. Reframing begins by separating the event from the story we have attached to it, then asking what else is supported by the facts.

An honest reframe leaves the difficulty in place. "This result shows me where I need support" may sit beside disappointment; it should not become "The result does not matter." Some situations are harmful or unjust and need action, not a more cheerful interpretation.

Questions for the room

  • How can the same event support more than one honest story?
  • Why might the first frame be especially narrow during pressure?
  • How can we recognise when a reframe has become denial or forced positivity?
3

The frame swap

15 min
  1. Model a low mark by separating the fact from a first frame such as "I am incapable" and another truth such as "This gives me information about where I need help."
  2. Give each group one fictional, low-disclosure situation, such as a missed bus, changed plan, disappointing result or place on the bench.
  3. Write the first narrow frame, then find two or three other frames that remain supported by the situation.
  4. Reject any wording that minimises the loss, blames the person or requires gratitude.
  5. Choose the frame that opens a realistic next step, including asking for help, resting, appealing a decision or doing nothing yet.
  6. Share the scenario, the wider frame and the possible next step, while leaving room for other interpretations.
4

Private reflection

7 min

Bring to mind a small, low-stakes hassle without writing what it was. What else is also true, and does that additional truth change anything you may choose next?

How they reflect Private journal

5

Closing

3 min

You do not need to argue with the first story or replace it with a brighter one. You can ask what else is true and let a fuller picture shape the next choice.

Safeguarding

Never ask students to reframe trauma, discrimination, abuse or a live personal difficulty. Keep scenarios fictional and personal reflection low-stakes. Follow safeguarding procedures if a disclosure emerges.

If something a young person says gives you concern, follow your setting’s usual safeguarding route. This is not yours to carry alone.

Adapting it

Ages 13 to 15
Use light, concrete situations and the sentence starter "Another true part of this is..."
Ages 16 to 18
Use more complex fictional situations and examine the line between reappraisal, denial and the need for structural action.

In other settings

Form time
Use the optional stress reframe, then find one additional truth in a fictional low-stakes situation.
Assembly
Model one scenario from the front and gather honest alternative frames without requiring personal examples.
Small group
Explore one fictional situation slowly and test each reframe for truth, care and the options it opens.

Curriculum connections

IB, ATL
Self-management: affective skills (self-motivation, resilience)Checked by AI review against the IB's MYP: From principles into practice, Approaches to learning (for use from September 2014/January 2015, a school-hosted copy) on 10 October 2026, not yet by a human adviser.
OECD Learning Compass
Skills: cognitive and meta-cognitive skills (creative thinking)Checked by AI review against the OECD Learning Compass 2030 concept notes Skills for 2030 and Core Foundations for 2030 (2019) on 10 October 2026, not yet by a human adviser.
UNESCO SEL
Critical Inquiry (finding a second, honest frame); Mindfulness (attention regulation)Checked by AI review against MGIEP's page naming the four competencies, with their definitions from summaries of Rethinking Learning (MGIEP, 2020), which could not be opened on 10 October 2026, not yet by a human adviser.
WHO life skills
Creative thinking — exploring alternative ways to see a situation; Coping with emotionsNot yet checked against its source.
Inner Development Goals
Thinking: Perspective Skills; Acting: ResilienceChecked by AI review against the Inner Development Guide's 25 skills across 5 dimensions (idg.guide, 2025) on 10 October 2026, not yet by a human adviser.

Suggest a correction

Find your country’s curriculum
Tell us how this lesson went

Your email opens with this lesson named in the subject, and nothing is sent until you send it. A person reads these.

Or write to info@recipesforwellbeing.org

    Arrow keys move between steps. F is full screen.